An Inquiry Into Small Go Boards for Go Beginner Education

Daniela Trinks /June 12, 2024

How to cite this article:
Trinks, D., Oh, C., Kim, C., Shim, D. U., Kim, J. (2024). An Inquiry Into Small Go Boards for Go Beginner Education. Journal of Go Studies, 18(1), 147-192.10.62578/513774

Abstract
        This study examines the educational benefits and challenges of using small Go boards to teach beginners. Through a thematic analysis of interviews with 13 experienced Go teachers, it discusses the advantages, disadvantages, and practical strategies for integrating small boards into Go education. It emphasizes how small boards make the game more accessible and less intimidating, promoting a quicker understanding of basic rules and enjoyment in the learning process. While noting great benefits such as increased engagement and simplified teaching, the study also acknowledges challenges like limited strategic development and the lack of teaching materials and guidelines regarding transitioning to the 19x19 board. The research contributes to a better understanding of effective approaches to introducing beginners to the game of Go in a more straightforward and enjoyable manner.

Keywords: Go Education, Small Go Boards, Differentiation, Go Promotion,
International Study


References

Bankauskas, D. (2000). Teaching Chess to Young Children. Young Children, 55(4), 33-34. http://www.jstor.org/stable/42727820

Cazenave, T. (2003). Ponnuki, Fivestones, and GoloisStrasbourg: three software to help Go Teachers. ICOB 2003; The 2nd International Conference on Baduk, 213-224.

Chee, C. M., & Wong, D. H. T. (2017). Affluent gaming experience could fail gamification in education: a review. IETE Technical Review, 34(6), 593-597.doi: 10.1080/02564602.2017.1315965

Fenech, A. (2001). Initiation. Retrieved from http://strasbourg.jeudego.org/regle_strasbourgeoise.htm

Terry, G., & Hayfield, N. (2020). Thematic Analysis. In M. Ward & S. Delamont (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research in education (2nd ed., pp. 430-441). Edward Elgar Publishing. doi: 10.4337/9781788977159.00049

Trinks, D. (2010). A Comparative Analysis of Go Education for Children Beginners in South Korea and Germany. Unpublished Master's Thesis. Graduate School, Myongji University, South Korea.

Trinks, D., & Oh, C. M. (2023). Exploring the Impact of AI on Go Education: A Teacher Survey. Journal of Go Studies, 17(2), 107-150.doi: 10.62578/689093

Moskowitz, M. L. (2013). Go nation: Chinese masculinities and the game of weiqi in China. University of California Press.doi: 10.1525/california/9780520276314.001.0001

Wan, S. H. (2011). Right Brain, Go medicine! A match millennia in the making. Neurology, 76(10), e40-e41.doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31820f2d68

Yasuda, Y. (2002). Go As Communication: The Educational and Therapeutic Value of the Game of Go. Slate & Shell Press.

Yasuda, Y. (2004). Let's Play Go! Slate & Shell Press.

Wakabayashi, H., & Ito, T. (2020). A System to Praise Moves for Motivating Go Beginners. Transactions of the Japanese Society for Artificial Intelligence, 2020(2), 1-8.

Kim, B. R. M. (2014). A Study on Developing Baduk-Play Program Based on Nuri Curriculum. The Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 14(11), 265-284.

Kim, B. R. M., & Cho, B. H. (2010). The Effect of the Baduk Play Activity Upon a Child's Intelligence, Problem-solving, and Delay of Gratification. Korean Journal of Human Ecology, 19(2), 245-256.doi: 10.5934/KJHE.2010.19.2.245

Kim, J. H., & Lee, H. J. (2009). An Environmental Analysis of the Baduk Education within After-School of Primary School. Journal of Go Studies, 6(1), 55-73.

Korea Baduk Federation. (2019). Korean Baduk Policy Research: Study on the Identity of the Korea Baduk Federation.

Yoon, Y. B. (2020). AlphaGo and Papago: Relationships between Artificial Intelligence and English Education. Korean Journal of Elementary Education, 31(4), 213-224.

Jeon, G. I. (2021). Exploring the Posthuman Pedagogy Spread Out on the Bansang-Go-Table. The Journal of Korean Educational Idea, 35(4), 245-287.

Jeong, S. H. (2016). Survey on the State of Baduk Education: An Analysis Based on the 2016 Gallup Korea Survey. In 2016 Baduk White Paper, Korea Baduk Federation.

Lee, H. J., & Jeong, S. H. (2007). The Effect of Baduk Education on Children's Emotional Intelligence and Baduk Knowledge Acquisition. Korean Society for Baduk Studies, 4(1), 47-64.

Chun, M. Y. (2009). The Way to Introduce Baduk Education as a Part of Effective Discretionary Activities. Journal of Go Studies, 6(1), 37-53.

Gallup Korea. (2016). National Perception and Education Status Survey on Baduk. In 2016 Baduk White Paper, Korea Baduk Federation.

TNO Korea. (2024). Report on the National Perception and Usage Status Survey of Baduk. Retrieved from https://www.kbaduk.or.kr/bbs/view/basic/baduk/14

Zhang, H., Wu, C., Xie, J., Lyu, Y., Cai, J., & Carroll, J. M. (2023). Redefining Qualitative Analysis in the AI Era: Utilizing ChatGPT for Efficient Thematic Analysis. ArXiv, abs/2309.10771. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2309.10771